Comments on Botsalano paper
Hello Editors,
Thank you for feedback. I am experimenting with Blogger and at the same time responding to your comments. The layout here is haywire, if you PREVIEW but that does not matter. This platform is not user-friendly.
If you don't have one yet, I suggest you start a Style Manual that you can send to prospective authors instead of spelling it out every time. Here is a start.
Typography
Font type- Verdana Font size normal, Paragraph normal, Not bold, not underlined, not italics
Main headings - ?? Verdana Font size Medium, Heading, Bold
Subheadings - ??
Photo and diagram captions - ??
I have spent hours this morning trying to understand Headings, Paragraphs, Normal, etc. It is a mess. Maybe Graham has cracked it. You have to look in Preview to see what the change did - not in Post: Edit. I have tried to standardise on Heading, Medium, Bold but there could still be different layouts in my paper.
Language
Latin names in italics
Common names lower case (ref Kate). Need to discuss. Maybe I am old fashioned and out of touch. I like capitalisation of proper nouns - Black jack, Vaderlandswilg
Abbreviations end with full stop (var., subsp., exceptions?)
Spacing - 100km or 100 km. If the latter then 'no break space' has to be used to prevent line break between the two parts
Points of the compass - North or north
Numbers
Spell out one to nine, thereafter use digits?
Photo specifications
etc, etc
from Graham
- Thanks Graham, will do
- The section headings are different sizes in the Preview. Will try to fix. Please check again.
- I quite like the blue headings in Preview but don't know where the blue came from. If it is important to you I can investigate further.
- The captions of the first two photos are bold in Preview and I cannot find a way to make them match the others.
- The first paragraph is double spaced in Preview and I can't change it. Should it be like that?
I have been through Jeff's paper and made a few changes to make it easier to read. SANBI's policy is lower case for common names but I am not sure whether we need to do that here. Two points: Common names - see note above.1 the paragraph on Camel thorn sandveld and Black thorn scrub -- should the latin names be mentioned? I don't think so because I explain where the name comes from in the following paragraph and adding latin at the beginning was an unnecessary complication. The outcome is the Tourist Guide that I tried to make tourist friendly but stay scientific. Happy to discuss further if you have a suggestion.2 the phrase 'not only a "Pierneef" tree' should be clarified or omitted. DoneOtherwise okay.
from Richard
Comments
Post a Comment